• case-insensitive prefix search: default
  e.g., sig matches "SIGIR" as well as "signal"
• exact word search: append dollar sign ($) to word
  e.g., graph$ matches "graph", but not "graphics"
• boolean and: separate words by space
  e.g., codd model
• boolean or: connect words by pipe symbol (|)
  e.g., graph|network

Update May 7, 2017: Please note that we had to disable the phrase search operator (.) and the boolean not operator (-) due to technical problems. For the time being, phrase search queries will yield regular prefix search result, and search terms preceded by a minus will be interpreted as regular (positive) search terms.

found 19 matches

• 2024
• 
  Varun P. Sarvade, Shrirang Ambaji Kulkarni:
  Deep learning based adaptive Ryu controller model for quality of experience issues in multimedia streaming for software defined vehicular networks. Appl. Intell. 54(20): 9543-9564 (2024)
• 2020
• 
  Bernhard Peischl, Benedikt Eberhardinger:
  Guest Editorial: Special issue on quality of adaptive software systems. Softw. Qual. J. 28(3): 1187-1188 (2020)
• 
  Claudia Raibulet, Francesca Arcelli Fontana, Simone Carettoni:
  Internal Software Quality Evaluation of Self-adaptive Systems Using Metrics, Patterns, and Smells. ENASE (Selected Papers) 2020: 386-419
• 
  Huyen T. T. Tran, Duc V. Nguyen, Truong Cong Thang:
  An open software for bitstream-based quality prediction in adaptive video streaming. MMSys 2020: 225-230
• 2017
• 
  Miltiadis G. Siavvas, Kyriakos C. Chatzidimitriou, Andreas L. Symeonidis:
  QATCH - An adaptive framework for software product quality assessment. Expert Syst. Appl. 86: 350-366 (2017)
• 2014
• 
  Mohammed Abufouda:
  Quality-aware Approach for Engineering Self-adaptive Software Systems. CoRR abs/1402.2611 (2014)
• 2013
• 
  Markus Luckey, Gregor Engels:
  High-quality specification of self-adaptive software systems. SEAMS 2013: 143-152
• 
  Anna Hannemann, Michael Hackstein, Ralf Klamma, Matthias Jarke:
  An Adaptive Filter-Framework for the Quality Improvement of Open-Source Software Analysis. Software Engineering 2013: 143-156
• 2011
• 
  Norha M. Villegas, Hausi A. Müller, Gabriel Tamura, Laurence Duchien, Rubby Casallas:
  A framework for evaluating quality-driven self-adaptive software systems. SEAMS 2011: 80-89
• 2009
• 
  Raffaela Mirandola, Ian Gorton, Christine Hofmeister:
  Architectures for Adaptive Software Systems, 5th International Conference on the Quality of Software Architectures, QoSA 2009, East Stroudsburg, PA, USA, June 24-26, 2009, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5581, Springer 2009, ISBN 978-3-642-02350-7 [contents]
• 2008
• 
  SiMing Li, Chen (Cherie) Ding, Chi-Hung Chi, Jianming Deng:
  Adaptive Quality Recommendation Mechanism for Software Service Provisioning. ICWS 2008: 169-176
• 2007
• 
  Denis Kozlov, Jussi Koskinen, Jouni Markkula, Markku Sakkinen:
  Evaluating the Impact of Adaptive Maintenance Process on Open Source Software Quality. ESEM 2007: 186-195
• 
  Mazeiar Salehie, Ladan Tahvildari:
  A Quality-Driven Approach to Enable Decision-Making in Self-Adaptive Software. ICSE Companion 2007: 103-104
• 2005
• 
  Padma Raghavan, Mary Jane Irwin, Lois C. McInnes, Boyana Norris:
  Adaptive Software for Scientific Computing: Co-Managing Quality-Performance-Power Tradeoffs. IPDPS 2005
• 2003
• 
  Jeffrey M. Voas:
  Adaptive Software Quality. ICEIS (1) 2003: 586-589
• 2002
• 
  Dirk Farin, Niels Mache, Peter H. N. de With:
  A software-based high-quality MPEG-2 encoder employing scene change detection and adaptive quantization. IEEE Trans. Consumer Electron. 48(4): 887-897 (2002)
• 2000
• 
  Bookshelf - Adaptive Software Development: A Collaborative Approach to Managing Complex Systems eXtreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, Software Process Quality: Management and Control. IEEE Softw. 17(4): 112-115 (2000)
• 1996
• 
  Ian Gladwell, Malgorzata A. Napierala:
  Efficiency of global adaptive quadrature. Quality of Numerical Software 1996: 326-329
• 1981
• 
  Jeoffrey P. Benson:
  Adaptive search techniques applied to software testing. Measurement and evaluation of software quality 1981: 109-116