• case-insensitive prefix search: default
  e.g., sig matches "SIGIR" as well as "signal"
• exact word search: append dollar sign ($) to word
  e.g., graph$ matches "graph", but not "graphics"
• boolean and: separate words by space
  e.g., codd model
• boolean or: connect words by pipe symbol (|)
  e.g., graph|network

Update May 7, 2017: Please note that we had to disable the phrase search operator (.) and the boolean not operator (-) due to technical problems. For the time being, phrase search queries will yield regular prefix search result, and search terms preceded by a minus will be interpreted as regular (positive) search terms.

found 26 matches

• 2020
• 
  Atheer Almogbil, Abdullah Alghofaili, Chelsea Deane, Timothy R. Leschke:
  Digital Forensic Analysis of Fitbit Wearable Technology: An Investigator's Guide. CSCloud/EdgeCom 2020: 44-49
• 2019
• 
  Charlie D. Frowd, Emma Portch, Abigail Killeen, Lydia Mullen, Alexander J. Martin, Peter J. B. Hancock:
  EvoFIT Facial Composite Images: A Detailed Assessment of Impact on Forensic Practitioners, Police Investigators, Victims, Witnesses, Offenders and the Media. EST 2019: 1-7
• 
  Umit Karabiyik, Christos Mousas, Daniel Sirota, Takahide Iwai, Mesut Akdere:
  A Virtual Reality Framework for Training Incident First Responders and Digital Forensic Investigators. ISVC (2) 2019: 469-480
• 
  Jatinder N. D. Gupta, Ezhil Kalaimannan, Seong-Moo Yoo:
  A Sequential Investigation Model for Solving Time Critical Digital Forensic Cases Involving a Single Investigator. NCS 2019: 202-219
• 
  Alastair Nisbet, Rijo Jacob:
  TRIM, Wear Levelling and Garbage Collection on Solid State Drives: A Prediction Model for Forensic Investigators. TrustCom/BigDataSE 2019: 419-426
• 2017
• 
  Bruce J. Nikkel:
  Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) for digital forensic investigators. Digit. Investig. 22: 133-141 (2017)
• 2016
• 
  Jatinder N. D. Gupta, Ezhil Kalaimannan, Seong-Moo Yoo:
  A heuristic for maximizing investigation effectiveness of digital forensic cases involving multiple investigators. Comput. Oper. Res. 69: 1-9 (2016)
• 
  Haider Abbas, Muhammad Yasin, Fahad Ahmed, Anam Sajid, Farrukh Aslam Khan, Rana Aamir Raza Ashfaq, Nur Al Hasan Haldar:
  Forensic artifacts modeling for social media client applications to enhance investigatory learning mechanisms. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 31(5): 2645-2658 (2016)
• 2015
• 
  Lionel Prat, Cheryl Baker, Nhien-An Le-Khac:
  MapExif: An Image Scanning and Mapping Tool for Investigators. Int. J. Digit. Crime Forensics 7(2): 53-78 (2015)
• 
  Thomas Lonardo, Alan Rea, Doug White:
  To License or Not to License Reexamined: An Updated Report on State Statutes Regarding Private Investigators and Digital Examiners. J. Digit. Forensics Secur. Law 10(1): 45-56 (2015)
• 
  Carla J. Utter, Alan Rea:
  The "Bring your own device" conundrum for organizations and investigators: An examination of the policy and legal concerns in light of investigatory challenges. J. Digit. Forensics Secur. Law 10(2): 55-72 (2015)
• 
  Wakas Mahmood, Hamid Jahankhani, Aykut Ozkaya:
  Cloud Forensics Challenges Faced by Forensic Investigators. ICGS3 2015: 74-82
• 2014
• 
  Timothy Vidas, Brian Kaplan, Matthew Geiger:
  OpenLV: Empowering investigators and first-responders in the digital forensics process. Digit. Investig. 11(1): S45-S53 (2014)
• 2013
• 
  Joshua I. James, Pavel Gladyshev:
  A survey of digital forensic investigator decision processes and measurement of decisions based on enhanced preview. Digit. Investig. 10(2): 148-157 (2013)
• 2012
• 
  Irfan Ahmed, Sebastian Obermeier, Martin Naedele, Golden G. Richard III:
  SCADA Systems: Challenges for Forensic Investigators. Computer 45(12): 44-51 (2012)
• 
  David Bennett:
  The Challenges Facing Computer Forensics Investigators in Obtaining Information from Mobile Devices for Use in Criminal Investigations. Inf. Secur. J. A Glob. Perspect. 21(3): 159-168 (2012)
• 
  Thomas Lonardo, Doug White, Alan Rea:
  To License or Not to License Updated: An Examination of State Statutes Regarding Private Investigators and Digital Examiners. J. Digit. Forensics Secur. Law 7(3): 83-110 (2012)
• 
  Elfadil Sabeil, Azizah Abdul Manaf, Zuraini Ismail:
  Development of Malaysian Digital Forensics Investigator Competency Identification Methods. AMLTA 2012: 554-565
• 2011
• 
  Robert J. Walls, Brian Neil Levine, Marc Liberatore, Clay Shields:
  Effective Digital Forensics Research Is Investigator-Centric. HotSec 2011
• 2010
• 
  Amelia Phillips, Kara L. Nance:
  Computer Forensics Investigators or Private Investigators: Who Is Investigating the Drive?. SADFE 2010: 150-157
• 2009
• 
  Gavin Wylie Manes, Elizabeth Downing:
  Overview of Licensing and Legal Issues for Digital Forensic Investigators. IEEE Secur. Priv. 7(2): 45-48 (2009)
• 
  Thomas Lonardo, Doug White, Alan Rea:
  To License or Not to License Revisited: An Examination of State Statutes Regarding Private Investigators and Digital Examiners. J. Digit. Forensics Secur. Law 4(3): 35-56 (2009)
• 2008
• 
  Joseph J. Schwerha IV:
  Why computer forensic professionals shouldn't be required to have private investigator licenses. Digit. Investig. 5(1-2): 71-72 (2008)
• 
  Thomas Lonardo, Doug White, Alan Rea:
  To License or Not to License: An Examination of State Statutes Regarding Private Investigators and Digital Examiners. J. Digit. Forensics Secur. Law 3(3): 61-80 (2008)
• 2007
• 
  Claire LaVelle, Almudena Konrad:
  FriendlyRoboCopy: A GUI to RoboCopy for computer forensic investigators. Digit. Investig. 4(1): 16-23 (2007)
• 2006
• 
  Ian Walden:
  Communication service providers: Forensic source and investigatory tool. Inf. Secur. Tech. Rep. 11(1): 10-17 (2006)