default search action
Google
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Internet Archive Scholar
CiteSeerX
ORCID12th ArgMining 2025: Vienna, Austria
- Elena Chistova, Philipp Cimiano, Shohreh Haddadan, Gabriella Lapesa, Ramon Ruiz-Dolz:
Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Argument Mining, ArgMining 2025, Vienna, Austria, July 31, 2025. Association for Computational Linguistics 2025, ISBN 979-8-89176-258-9 - Proceedings of the 12th Argument mining Workshop.
- Erisa Bytyqi, Annette Hautli-Janisz:
"The Facts Speak for Themselves": GPT and Fallacy Classification. 1-10 - Yamen Ajjour, Henning Wachsmuth:
Exploring LLM Priming Strategies for Few-Shot Stance Classification. 11-23 - Elena Musi, Nadin Kökciyan, Khalid Al Khatib, Davide Ceolin, Emmanuelle Dietz, Klara Gutekunst, Annette Hautli-Janisz, Cristian Manuel Santibañez Yañez, Jodi Schneider, Jonas Scholz, Cor Steging, Jacky Visser, Henning Wachsmuth:
Toward Reasonable Parrots: Why Large Language Models Should Argue with Us by Design. 24-31 - Kilian Bartz, Mirko Lenz, Ralph Bergmann:
Retrieving Argument Graphs Using Vision Transformers. 32-45 - Davide Bassi, Erik Bran Marino, Renata Vieira
, Martin Pereira-Fariña:
Old but Gold: LLM-Based Features and Shallow Learning Methods for Fine-Grained Controversy Analysis in YouTube Comments. 46-57 - Harvey Bonmu Ku, Jeongyeol Shin, Hyoun Jun Lee, Seon-Ok Na, Insu Jeon:
Multi-Agent LLM Debate Unveils the Premise Left Unsaid. 58-73 - Deborah Dore, Stefano Faralli, Serena Villata:
Leveraging Graph Structural Knowledge to Improve Argument Relation Prediction in Political Debates. 74-86 - Robin Schaefer:
On Integrating LLMs Into an Argument Annotation Workflow. 87-99 - Debela Gemechu, Ramon Ruiz-Dolz, John Lawrence, Chris Reed:
Practical Solutions to Practical Problems in Developing Argument Mining Systems. 100-106 - Carlotta Giacchetta, Raffaella Bernardi, Barbara Montini, Jacopo Staiano, Serena Tomasi:
Argumentative Analysis of Legal Rulings: A Structured Framework Using Bobbitt's Typology. 107-115 - Wendi Zhou, Ameer Saadat-Yazdi, Nadin Kökciyan:
Aspect-Based Opinion Summarization with Argumentation Schemes. 116-125 - Carlotta Quensel, Neele Falk, Gabriella Lapesa:
Investigating Subjective Factors of Argument Strength: Storytelling, Emotions, and Hedging. 126-139 - Martin Gruber, Zlata Kikteva, Ignaz Rutter, Annette Hautli-Janisz:
DebArgVis: An Interactive Visualisation Tool for Exploring Argumentative Dynamics in Debate. 140-146 - Carolin Schindler, Annalena Aicher, Niklas Rach, Wolfgang Minker:
Automatic Identification and Naming of Overlapping and Topic-specific Argumentation Frames. 147-159 - Anas Belfathi, Nicolas Hernandez, Laura Monceaux, Richard Dufour:
A Simple but Effective Context Retrieval for Sequential Sentence Classification in Long Legal Documents. 160-167 - Natalia Evgrafova, Loic De Langhe, Véronique Hoste, Els Lefever:
Stance-aware Definition Generation for Argumentative Texts. 168-180 - Ines Zelch, Matthias Hagen, Benno Stein, Johannes Kiesel:
Reproducing the Argument Quality Prediction of Project Debater. 181-188 - Jannis Köckritz, Bahar Ilgen, Georges Hattab:
Reasoning Under Distress: Mining Claims and Evidence in Mental Health Narratives. 189-194 - Maximilian Heinrich, Khalid Al Khatib, Benno Stein:
Multi-Class versus Means-End: Assessing Classification Approaches for Argument Patterns. 195-204 - Maria Poiaganova, Manfred Stede:
From Debates to Diplomacy: Argument Mining Across Political Registers. 205-216 - Sara Nabhani, Khalid Al Khatib, Federico Pianzola, Malvina Nissim:
Storytelling in Argumentative Discussions: Exploring the Use of Narratives in ChangeMyView. 217-227 - Ines Zelch, Matthias Hagen, Benno Stein, Johannes Kiesel:
Segmentation of Argumentative Texts by Key Statements for Argument Mining from the Web. 228-242 - Blanca Calvo Figueras, Jaione Bengoetxea, Maite Heredia, Ekaterina Sviridova, Elena Cabrio, Serena Villata, Rodrigo Agerri:
Overview of the Critical Questions Generation Shared Task. 243-257 - Jinghui Zhang, Dongming Yang, Binghuai Lin:
StateCloud at Critical Questions Generation: Prompt Engineering for Critical Question Generation. 258-264 - Tien-Dat Nguyen, Duc-Vu Nguyen:
Tdnguyen at CQs-Gen 2025: Adapt Large Language Models with Multi-Step Reasoning for Critical Questions Generation. 265-280 - Midhun Kanadan, Johannes Kiesel, Maximilian Heinrich, Benno Stein:
Webis at CQs-Gen 2025: Prompting and Reranking for Critical Questions. 281-288 - Wendi Zhou, Ameer Saadat-Yazdi, Nadin Kökciyan:
DayDreamer at CQs-Gen 2025: Generating Critical Questions through Argument Scheme Completion. 289-294 - Sajib Bhattacharjee, Tabassum Basher Rashfi, Samia Rahman, Hasan Murad:
CUET_SR34 at CQs-Gen 2025: Critical Question Generation via Few-Shot LLMs - Integrating NER and Argument Schemes. 295-300 - Alan Ramponi, Gaudenzia Genoni, Sara Tonelli:
ARG2ST at CQs-Gen 2025: Critical Questions Generation through LLMs and Usefulness-based Selection. 301-313 - Roxanne El Baff, Dominik Opitz, Diaoulé Diallo:
CriticalBrew at CQs-Gen 2025: Collaborative Multi-Agent Generation and Evaluation of Critical Questions for Arguments. 314-321 - Lucile Favero, Daniel Frases, Juan Antonio Pérez-Ortiz, Tanja Käser, Nuria Oliver:
ELLIS Alicante at CQs-Gen 2025: Winning the critical thinking questions shared task: LLM-based question generation and selection. 322-331 - Sha Newaz Mahmud, Shahriar Hossain, Samia Rahman, Momtazul Labib, Hasan Murad:
Mind_Matrix at CQs-Gen 2025: Adaptive Generation of Critical Questions for Argumentative Interventions. 332-339 - Azwad Anjum Islam, Tisa Islam Erana, Mark A. Finlayson:
COGNAC at CQs-Gen 2025: Generating Critical Questions with LLM-Assisted Prompting and Multiple RAG Variants. 340-348 - Frieso Turkstra, Sara Nabhani, Khalid Al-Khatib:
TriLLaMa at CQs-Gen 2025: A Two-Stage LLM-Based System for Critical Question Generation. 349-357 - Eleonora Mancini, Federico Ruggeri, Serena Villata, Paolo Torroni:
Overview of MM-ArgFallacy2025 on Multimodal Argumentative Fallacy Detection and Classification in Political Debates. 358-368 - Eva Cantín Larumbe, Adriana Chust Vendrell:
Argumentative Fallacy Detection in Political Debates. 369-373 - Warale Avinash Kalyan, Siddharth Pagaria, V. Chaitra, H. G. Spoorthi:
Multimodal Argumentative Fallacy Classification in Political Debates. 374-380 - Abdullah Tahir, Imaan Ibrar, Huma Ameer, Mehwish Fatima, Seemab Latif:
Prompt-Guided Augmentation and Multi-modal Fusion for Argumentative Fallacy Classification in Political Debates. 381-387 - Alessio Pittiglio:
Leveraging Context for Multimodal Fallacy Classification in Political Debates. 388-397
manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.
last updated on 2025-12-24 23:47 CET by the dblp team
all metadata released as open data under CC0 1.0 license
see also: Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Imprint
dblp was originally created in 1993 at:
since 2018, dblp has been operated and maintained by:
the dblp computer science bibliography is funded and supported by:
