Henry Prakken

Sanjay Modgil, Henry Prakken: A general account of argumentation with preferences. Artif. Intell. 195: 361-397 (2013)

Henry Prakken: Reconstructing Popov v. Hayashi in a framework for argumentation with structured arguments and Dungean semantics. Artif. Intell. Law 20(1): 57-82 (2012)

Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Michal Araszkiewicz, Kevin D. Ashley, Katie Atkinson, Floris Bex, Filipe Borges, Danièle Bourcier, Paul Bourgine, Jack G. Conrad, Enrico Francesconi, Thomas F. Gordon, Guido Governatori, Jochen L. Leidner, David D. Lewis, Ronald Prescott Loui, L. Thorne McCarty, Henry Prakken, Frank Schilder, Erich Schweighofer, Paul Thompson, Alex Tyrrell, Bart Verheij, Douglas N. Walton, Adam Zachary Wyner: A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law. Artif. Intell. Law 20(3): 215-319 (2012)

Eric M. Kok, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk: Testing the benfits of structured argumentation in multi-agent deliberation dialogues. AAMAS 2012: 1411-1412

Henry Prakken: Some Reflections on Two Current Trends in Formal Argumentation. Logic Programs, Norms and Action 2012: 249-272

Sanjay Modgil, Henry Prakken: Resolutions in Structured Argumentation. COMMA 2012: 310-321

Henry Prakken, Sanjay Modgil: Clarifying some misconceptions on the ASPIC⁺ framework. COMMA 2012: 442-453

Henry Prakken: Formalising a legal opinion on a legislative proposal in the ASPIC⁺ framework. JURIX 2012: 119-128

Thomas L. van der Weide, Frank Dignum, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk: Multi-criteria Argument Selection in Persuasion Dialogues. ArgMAS 2011: 136-153

Thomas L. van der Weide, Frank Dignum, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk: Multi-criteria argument selection in persuasion dialogues. AAMAS 2011: 921-928

Eric M. Kok, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Herre van Oostendorp, Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk: A Methodology for the Generation of Multi-agent Argumentation Dialogue Scenarios. EUMAS 2011: 160-174

Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Henry Prakken, Wietske Visser: Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation. ICAIL 2011: 21-30

Sanjay Modgil, Henry Prakken: Revisiting Preferences and Argumentation. IJCAI 2011: 1021-1026

Bas van Gijzel, Henry Prakken: Relating Carneades with Abstract Argumentation. IJCAI 2011: 1113-1119

Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor: On modelling burdens and standards of proof in structured argumentation. JURIX 2011: 83-92

Floris J. Bex, Peter J. van Koppen, Henry Prakken, Bart Verheij: A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence. Artif. Intell. Law 18(2): 123-152 (2010)

Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Henry Prakken: Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law. Artif. Intell. Law 18(2): 153-174 (2010)

Roger Azevedo, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Gautam Biswas, Ted Carmichael, Nancy Green, Mirsad Hadzikadic, Oluwasanmi Koyejo, Unmesh Kurup, Simon Parsons, Roberto Pirrone, Henry Prakken, Alexei Samsonovich, Donia Scott, Richard Souvenir: Reports of the AAAI 2009 Fall Symposia. AI Magazine 31(1): 88-94 (2010)

Eric M. Kok, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk: A Formal Argumentation Framework for Deliberation Dialogues. ArgMAS 2010: 31-48

Thomas L. van der Weide, Frank Dignum, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk: Arguing about Preferences and Decisions. ArgMAS 2010: 68-85

Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Chris Reed: A formal analysis of the AIF in terms of the ASPIC framework. COMMA 2010: 99-110

Sanjay Modgil, Henry Prakken: Reasoning about Preferences in Structured Extended Argumentation Frameworks. COMMA 2010: 347-358

Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Henry Prakken: A lightweight formal model of two-phase democratic deliberation. JURIX 2010: 27-36

Jürgen Dix, Simon Parsons, Henry Prakken, Guillermo Ricardo Simari: Research challenges for argumentation. Computer Science - R&D 23(1): 27-34 (2009)

Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Henry Prakken: Editorial: Logic and Law Corner. J. Log. Comput. 19(6): 899 (2009)

Thomas L. van der Weide, Frank Dignum, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk: Practical Reasoning Using Values. ArgMAS 2009: 79-93

Sindhu Joseph, Henry Prakken: Coherence-driven argumentation to norm consensus. ICAIL 2009: 58-67

Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Henry Prakken: A case study of hypothetical and value-based reasoning in US Supreme-Court cases. JURIX 2009: 11-20

Henry Prakken: A formal model of adjudication dialogues. Artif. Intell. Law 16(3): 305-328 (2008)

Henry Prakken: Formalising ordinary legal disputes: a case study. Artif. Intell. Law 16(4): 333-359 (2008)

Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Henry Prakken: Introducing the Logic and Law Corner. J. Log. Comput. 18(1): 1-12 (2008)

Thomas L. van der Weide, Frank Dignum, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk: Personality-Based Practical Reasoning. ArgMAS 2008: 3-18

Floris Bex, Henry Prakken: Investigating Stories in a Formal Dialogue Game. COMMA 2008: 73-84

Sanjay Modgil, Henry Prakken: Applying Preferences to Dialogue Graphs. COMMA 2008: 252-263

Régis Riveret, Henry Prakken, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor: Heuristics in Argumentation: A Game Theory Investigation. COMMA 2008: 324-335

Susan W. van den Braak, Herre van Oostendorp, Gerard Vreeswijk, Henry Prakken: The role of compression and refinement in visualization tools for crime analysts. ICLS (3) 2008: 143-144

Henry Prakken: Combining Modes of Reasoning: An Application of Abstract Argumentation. JELIA 2008: 349-361

Susan W. van den Braak, Herre van Oostendorp, Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk: Representing narrative and testimonial knowledge in sense-making software for crime analysis. JURIX 2008: 160-169

Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor: More on Presumptions and Burdens of Proof. JURIX 2008: 176-185

Thomas F. Gordon, Henry Prakken, Douglas Walton: The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artif. Intell. 171(10-15): 875-896 (2007)

Floris J. Bex, Henry Prakken, Bart Verheij: Formalising argumentative story-based analysis of evidence. ICAIL 2007: 1-10

Susan W. van den Braak, Gerard Vreeswijk, Henry Prakken: AVERs: an argument visualization tool for representing stories about evidence. ICAIL 2007: 11-15

Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor: Formalising arguments about the burden of persuasion. ICAIL 2007: 97-106

Pieter Dijkstra, Henry Prakken, Kees de Vey Mestdagh: An implementation of norm-based agent negotiation. ICAIL 2007: 167-175

Jobien Sombekke, Tom M. van Engers, Henry Prakken: Argumentation structures in legal dossiers. ICAIL 2007: 277-281

Régis Riveret, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor, Henry Prakken, Bram Roth: Success chances in argument games: a probabilistic approach to legal disputes. JURIX 2007: 99-108

Henry Prakken: Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. Knowledge Eng. Review 21(2): 163-188 (2006)

Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Henry Prakken: Justifying Actions by Accruing Arguments. COMMA 2006: 247-258

Henry Prakken: Combining sceptical epistemic reasoning with credulous practical reasoning. COMMA 2006: 311-322

Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Bart Verhey: Anchored Narratives in Reasoning about Evidence. JURIX 2006: 11-20

Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor: Presumptions and Burdens of Proof. JURIX 2006: 21-30

Pieter Dijkstra, Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Kees de Vey Mestdagh: Towards a multi-agent system for regulated information exchange in crime investigations. Artif. Intell. Law 13(1): 133-151 (2005)

Henry Prakken: Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation. J. Log. Comput. 15(6): 1009-1040 (2005)

Jelle van Veenen, Henry Prakken: A Protocol for Arguing About Rejections in Negotiation. ArgMAS 2005: 138-153

Jelle van Veenen, Henry Prakken: A verifiable protocol for arguing about rejections in negotiation. AAMAS 2005: 1165-1166

Henry Prakken: A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning. ICAIL 2005: 85-94

Henry Prakken, Chris Reed, Douglas Walton: Dialogues about the burden of proof. ICAIL 2005: 115-124

Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Chris Reed, Douglas Walton: Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning about Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and Generalisations. Artif. Intell. Law 11(2-3): 125-165 (2003)

Gerhard Brewka, Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk: Special Issue on Computational Dialectics: an Introduction. J. Log. Comput. 13(3): 317-318 (2003)

Hugo de Bruin, Henry Prakken, Jörgen S. Svensson: The use of legal knowledge-based systems in public administration: what can go wrong? Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems 2003: 14-16

Henry Prakken, Chris Reed, Douglas Walton: Argumentation Schemes and Generalizations in Reasoning about Evidence. ICAIL 2003: 32-41

Henry Prakken: An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning. Artif. Intell. Law 10(1-3): 113-133 (2002)

Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor: The Role of Logic in Computational Models of Legal Argument: A Critical Survey. Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond 2002: 342-381

Henry Prakken: Intuitions and the modelling of defeasible reasoning: some case studies. NMR 2002: 91-102

Henry Prakken: Intuitions and the modelling of defeasible reasoning: some case studies. CoRR cs.AI/0207031 (2002)

Henry Prakken: Modelling Defeasibility in Law: Logic or Procedure? Fundam. Inform. 48(2-3): 253-271 (2001)

Henry Prakken: Modelling reasoning about evidence in legal procedure. ICAIL 2001: 119-128

Eveline T. Feteris, Henry Prakken: Introduction: Dialectical legal argument: Formal and informal models. Artif. Intell. Law 8(2/3): 107-113 (2000)

Henry Prakken: On Dialogue Systems with Speech Acts, Arguments, and Counterarguments. JELIA 2000: 224-238

Gerard Vreeswijk, Henry Prakken: Credulous and Sceptical Argument Games for Preferred Semantics. JELIA 2000: 239-253

Henry Prakken, Thomas F. Gordon: Rules of Order for Electronic Group Decision Making - A Formalization Methodology. Collaboration between Human and Artificial Societies 1999: 246-263

Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor: A System for Defeasible Argumentation, with Defeasible Priorities. Artificial Intelligence Today 1999: 365-379

Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor: Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue Game. Artif. Intell. Law 6(2-4): 231-287 (1998)

Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor: Argument-Based Extended Logic Programming with Defeasible Priorities. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7(1): 25-75 (1997)

Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor: Reasoning with Precedents in a Dialogue Game. ICAIL 1997: 1-9

Henry Prakken: Dialectical Proof Theory for Defeasible Argumentation with Defeasible Priorities (Preliminary Report). ModelAge Workshop 1997: 202-215

Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor: A Dialectical Model of Assessing Conflicting Arguments in Legal Reasoning. Artif. Intell. Law 4(3-4): 331-368 (1996)

Henry Prakken: Two Approaches to the Formalisation of Defeasible Deontic Reasoning. Studia Logica 57(1): 73-90 (1996)

Henry Prakken, Marek J. Sergot: Contrary-to-Duty Obligations. Studia Logica 57(1): 91-115 (1996)

Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor: A System for Defeasible Argumentation, with Defeasible Priorities. FAPR 1996: 510-524

Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor: On the Relation Between Legal Language and Legal Argument: Assumptions, Applicability and Dynamic Priorities. ICAIL 1995: 1-10

Henry Prakken: From Logic to Dialectics in Legal Argument. ICAIL 1995: 165-174

Henry Prakken: An Argumentation Framework in Default Logic. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 9(1-2): 93-132 (1993)

Henry Prakken: A Logical Framework for Modelling Legal Argument. ICAIL 1993: 1-9

Henry Prakken: A Tool in Modelling Disagreement in Law: Preferring the Most Specific Argument. ICAIL 1991: 165-174