 | 2012 |
|---|
| 67 |       | Jerome K. Vanclay,
Lutz Bornmann:
Metrics to evaluate research
CoRR abs/1201.3068: (2012) |
| 66 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hermann Schier,
Werner Marx,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality?
J. Informetrics 6(1): 11-18 (2012) |
| 65 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Werner Marx:
HistCite analysis of papers constituting the h index research front.
J. Informetrics 6(2): 285-288 (2012) |
| 64 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Félix de Moya Anegón,
Loet Leydesdorff:
The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011.
J. Informetrics 6(2): 333-335 (2012) |
| 63 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Loet Leydesdorff:
Which are the best performing regions in information science in terms of highly cited papers? Some improvements of our previous mapping approaches.
J. Informetrics 6(2): 336-345 (2012) |
| 62 | | Jerome K. Vanclay,
Lutz Bornmann:
Metrics to evaluate research performance in academic institutions: a critique of ERA 2010 as applied in forestry and the indirect H2 index as a possible alternative.
Scientometrics 91(3): 751-771 (2012) |
| 61 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Markus Wolf,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Closed versus open reviewing of journal manuscripts: how far do comments differ in language use?
Scientometrics 91(3): 843-856 (2012) |
| 60 | | Lutz Bornmann:
The Hawthorne effect in journal peer review.
Scientometrics 91(3): 857-862 (2012) |
| 2011 |
|---|
| 59 | | Loet Leydesdorff,
Lutz Bornmann,
Rüdiger Mutz,
Tobias Opthof:
Normalizing the measurement of citation performance: Principles for comparing sets of documents
CoRR abs/1101.3863: (2011) |
| 58 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Ludo Waltman:
The detection of "hot regions" in the geography of science: A visualization approach by using density maps
CoRR abs/1102.3862: (2011) |
| 57 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Loet Leydesdorff:
Which cities produce excellent papers worldwide more than can be expected? A new mapping approach--using Google Maps--based on statistical significance testing
CoRR abs/1103.3216: (2011) |
| 56 | | Loet Leydesdorff,
Lutz Bornmann:
Integrated Impact Indicators (I3) compared with Impact Factors (IFs): An alternative research design with policy implications
CoRR abs/1103.5241: (2011) |
| 55 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Werner Marx:
The Anna Karenina principle: A mechanism for the explanation of success in science
CoRR abs/1104.0807: (2011) |
| 54 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Loet Leydesdorff,
Christiane Walch-Solimena,
Christoph Ettl:
Mapping excellence in the geography of science: An approach based on Scopus data
CoRR abs/1105.4736: (2011) |
| 53 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Loet Leydesdorff:
Which cities' paper output and
CoRR abs/1109.1173: (2011) |
| 52 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Félix de Moya Anegón,
Loet Leydesdorff:
The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011
CoRR abs/1110.2305: (2011) |
| 51 | | Loet Leydesdorff,
Lutz Bornmann:
Mapping (USPTO) Patent Data using Overlays to Google Maps
CoRR abs/1110.5712: (2011) |
| 50 | | Loet Leydesdorff,
Lutz Bornmann:
Testing Differences Statistically with the Leiden Ranking
CoRR abs/1112.4037: (2011) |
| 49 | | Loet Leydesdorff,
Lutz Bornmann:
Percentile Ranks and the Integrated Impact Indicator (I3)
CoRR abs/1112.6281: (2011) |
| 48 | | Leo Egghe,
Lutz Bornmann,
Raf Guns:
A proposal for a First-Citation-Speed-Index.
J. Informetrics 5(1): 181-186 (2011) |
| 47 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Rüdiger Mutz:
Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance: The avoidance of citation (ratio) averages in field-normalization.
J. Informetrics 5(1): 228-230 (2011) |
| 46 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Rüdiger Mutz,
Sven E. Hug,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants.
J. Informetrics 5(3): 346-359 (2011) |
| 45 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Félix de Moya Anegón:
Some interesting insights from aggregated data published in the World Report SIR 2010.
J. Informetrics 5(3): 486-488 (2011) |
| 44 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Loet Leydesdorff,
Christiane Walch-Solimena,
Christoph Ettl:
Mapping excellence in the geography of science: An approach based on Scopus data.
J. Informetrics 5(4): 537-546 (2011) |
| 43 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Ludo Waltman:
The detection of "hot regions" in the geography of science - A visualization approach by using density maps.
J. Informetrics 5(4): 547-553 (2011) |
| 42 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Andrew Plume:
Is it necessary to consider suburbs (or small cities in the close proximity) and name variants in a citation impact analysis for bigger cities? An investigation using Munich as an example.
J. Informetrics 5(4): 695-697 (2011) |
| 41 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hermann Schier,
Werner Marx,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? A study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes.
JASIST 62(1): 61-71 (2011) |
| 40 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Loet Leydesdorff:
Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? A new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing.
JASIST 62(10): 1954-1962 (2011) |
| 39 | | Loet Leydesdorff,
Lutz Bornmann:
Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications.
JASIST 62(11): 2133-2146 (2011) |
| 38 | | Loet Leydesdorff,
Lutz Bornmann:
How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor: Normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science.
JASIST 62(2): 217-229 (2011) |
| 37 | | Loet Leydesdorff,
Lutz Bornmann,
Rüdiger Mutz,
Tobias Opthof:
Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents.
JASIST 62(7): 1370-1381 (2011) |
| 36 | | Lutz Bornmann:
Do we need the E-index in addition to the h-index and its variants?
JASIST 62(7): 1433-1434 (2011) |
| 35 | | Andreas Thor,
Lutz Bornmann:
The calculation of the single publication h index and related performances measures: A Web application based on Google Scholar data.
Online Information Review 35(2): (2011) |
| 34 | | Lutz Bornmann:
Mimicry in science?
Scientometrics 86(1): 173-177 (2011) |
| 33 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Christoph Neuhaus,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
The effect of a two-stage publication process on the Journal Impact Factor: a case study on the interactive open access journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
Scientometrics 86(1): 93-97 (2011) |
| 32 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hermann Schier,
Werner Marx,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Does the h index for assessing single publications really work? A case study on papers published in chemistry.
Scientometrics 89(3): 835-843 (2011) |
| 2010 |
|---|
| 31 | | Loet Leydesdorff,
Lutz Bornmann:
How fractional counting affects the Impact Factor: Steps towards field-independent classifications of scholarly journals and literature
CoRR abs/1007.4749: (2010) |
| 30 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Citation speed as a measure to predict the attention an article receives: An investigation of the validity of editorial decisions at Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
J. Informetrics 4(1): 83-88 (2010) |
| 29 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Loet Leydesdorff,
Peter Van den Besselaar:
A meta-evaluation of scientific research proposals: Different ways of comparing rejected to awarded applications.
J. Informetrics 4(3): 211-220 (2010) |
| 28 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Rüdiger Mutz,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
The h index research output measurement: Two approaches to enhance its accuracy.
J. Informetrics 4(3): 407-414 (2010) |
| 27 | | Lutz Bornmann:
Towards an ideal method of measuring research performance: Some comments to the Opthof and Leydesdorff (2010) paper.
J. Informetrics 4(3): 441-443 (2010) |
| 26 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
The citation speed index: A useful bibliometric indicator to add to the h index.
J. Informetrics 4(3): 444-446 (2010) |
| 25 | | Werner Marx,
Lutz Bornmann,
Manuel Cardona:
Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods.
JASIST 61(10): 2061-2069 (2010) |
| 24 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Christophe Weymuth,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
A content analysis of referees' comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ?
Scientometrics 83(2): 493-506 (2010) |
| 23 | | Werner Marx,
Lutz Bornmann:
How accurately does Thomas Kuhn's model of paradigm change describe the transition from the static view of the universe to the big bang theory in cosmology? - A historical reconstruction and citation analysis.
Scientometrics 84(2): 441-464 (2010) |
| 22 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
The validity of staff editors' initial evaluations of manuscripts: a case study of Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
Scientometrics 85(3): 681-687 (2010) |
| 2009 |
|---|
| 21 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Loet Leydesdorff,
Werner Marx:
Citation Environment of Angewandte Chemie
CoRR abs/0911.3086: (2009) |
| 20 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Loet Leydesdorff,
Peter Van den Besselaar:
A Meta-evaluation of Scientific Research Proposals: Different Ways of Comparing Rejected to Awarded Applications
CoRR abs/0911.3558: (2009) |
| 19 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Werner Marx,
Hermann Schier,
Erhard Rahm,
Andreas Thor,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry - Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts.
J. Informetrics 3(1): 27-35 (2009) |
| 18 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Extent of type I and type II errors in editorial decisions: A case study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
J. Informetrics 3(4): 348-352 (2009) |
| 17 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Rüdiger Mutz,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Do we need the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures?
JASIST 60(6): 1286-1289 (2009) |
| 16 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Universality of citation distributions-A validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator cf = c/c0 at the micro level using data from chemistry.
JASIST 60(8): 1664-1670 (2009) |
| 15 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Rüdiger Mutz,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
The influence of the applicants' gender on the modeling of a peer review process by using latent Markov models.
Scientometrics 81(2): 407-411 (2009) |
| 2008 |
|---|
| 14 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Rüdiger Mutz,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Latent Markov modeling applied to grant peer review.
J. Informetrics 2(3): 217-228 (2008) |
| 13 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Rüdiger Mutz,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
How to detect indications of potential sources of bias in peer review: A generalized latent variable modeling approach exemplified by a gender study.
J. Informetrics 2(4): 280-287 (2008) |
| 12 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere.
JASIST 59(11): 1841-1852 (2008) |
| 11 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Rüdiger Mutz,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine.
JASIST 59(5): 830-837 (2008) |
| 2007 |
|---|
| 10 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Gatekeepers of science - Effects of external reviewers' attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications.
J. Informetrics 1(1): 83-91 (2007) |
| 9 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Convergent validation of peer review decisions using the h index: Extent of and reasons for type I and type II errors.
J. Informetrics 1(3): 204-213 (2007) |
| 8 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Rüdiger Mutz,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis.
J. Informetrics 1(3): 226-238 (2007) |
| 7 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Multiple publication on a single research study: Does it pay? The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine.
JASIST 58(8): 1100-1107 (2007) |
| 6 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
What do we know about the h index?
JASIST 58(9): 1381-1385 (2007) |
| 5 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Rüdiger Mutz,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Row-column (RC) association model applied to grant peer review.
Scientometrics 73(2): 139-147 (2007) |
| 2006 |
|---|
| 4 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants.
Scientometrics 68(3): 427-440 (2006) |
| 2005 |
|---|
| 3 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions.
Scientometrics 63(2): 297-320 (2005) |
| 2 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Hans-Dieter Daniel:
Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?
Scientometrics 65(3): 391-392 (2005) |
| 2004 |
|---|
| 1 | | Lutz Bornmann,
Jürgen Enders:
Social origin and gender of doctoral degree holders.
Scientometrics 61(1): 19-41 (2004) |
Data released under the ODC-BY 1.0 license — See also our legal information page