![]() | ![]() |
| 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 88 | Kevin D. Ashley, Tom M. van Engers: The 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Proceedings of the Conference, June 6-10, 2011, Pittsburgh, PA, USA ACM 2011 | |
| 87 | Ilya M. Goldin, Kevin D. Ashley: Peering Inside Peer Review with Bayesian Models. AIED 2011: 90-97 | |
| 86 | Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley: Facilitating case comparison using value judgments and intermediate legal concepts. ICAIL 2011: 161-170 | |
| 85 | Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley: Can temporal representation and reasoning make a difference in automated legal reasoning?: lessons from an AI-based ethical reasoner. ICAIL 2011: 229-238 | |
| 84 | Kevin D. Ashley, Ilya M. Goldin: Toward AI-enhanced Computer-supported Peer Review in Legal Education. JURIX 2011: 3-12 | |
| 83 | Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley, Rebecca Hwa, Patricia M. Sweeney: Toward Extracting Information from Public Health Statutes using Text Classification Machine Learning. JURIX 2011: 73-82 | |
| 2010 | ||
| 82 | Ilya M. Goldin, Kevin D. Ashley: Eliciting Informative Feedback in Peer Review: Importance of Problem-Specific Scaffolding. Intelligent Tutoring Systems (1) 2010: 95-104 | |
| 81 | Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley: Argumentation with Value Judgments - An Example of Hypothetical Reasoning. JURIX 2010: 67-76 | |
| 80 | Kevin D. Ashley, Will Bridewell: Emerging AI & Law approaches to automating analysis and retrieval of electronically stored information in discovery proceedings. Artif. Intell. Law 18(4): 311-320 (2010) | |
| 2009 | ||
| 79 | Niels Pinkwart, Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven: Assessing Argument Diagrams in an Ill-defined Domain. AIED 2009: 590-592 | |
| 78 | Kevin D. Ashley: What a Legal CBR Ontology Should Provide. FLAIRS Conference 2009 | |
| 77 | Kevin D. Ashley: Ontological requirements for analogical, teleological, and hypothetical legal reasoning. ICAIL 2009: 1-10 | |
| 76 | Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven: Toward assessing law students' argument diagrams. ICAIL 2009: 222-223 | |
| 75 | Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley: Using critical questions to disambiguate and formalize statutory provisions. ICAIL 2009: 240-241 | |
| 74 | Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven: Toward Modeling and Teaching Legal Case-Based Adaptation with Expert Examples. ICCBR 2009: 45-59 | |
| 73 | Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven: Argument Diagramming and Diagnostic Reliability. JURIX 2009: 106-115 | |
| 72 | Kevin D. Ashley, Stefanie Brüninghaus: Automatically classifying case texts and predicting outcomes. Artif. Intell. Law 17(2): 125-165 (2009) | |
| 71 | Kevin D. Ashley: Teaching a process model of legal argument with hypotheticals. Artif. Intell. Law 17(4): 321-370 (2009) | |
| 70 | Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven: Concepts, Structures, and Goals: Redefining Ill-Definedness. I. J. Artificial Intelligence in Education 19(3): 253-266 (2009) | |
| 69 | Niels Pinkwart, Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch, Vincent Aleven: Evaluating an Intelligent Tutoring System for Making Legal Arguments with Hypotheticals. I. J. Artificial Intelligence in Education 19(4): 401-424 (2009) | |
| 2008 | ||
| 68 | Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven: Argument graph classification with Genetic Programming and C4.5. EDM 2008: 137-146 | |
| 67 | Kevin D. Ashley: Some Thoughts on Using Computers to Teach Argumentation. FLAIRS Conference 2008: 17 | |
| 66 | Niels Pinkwart, Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven, Collin Lynch: Graph Grammars: An ITS Technology for Diagram Representations. FLAIRS Conference 2008: 433-438 | |
| 65 | Niels Pinkwart, Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven: Re-evaluating LARGO in the Classroom: Are Diagrams Better Than Text for Teaching Argumentation Skills?. Intelligent Tutoring Systems 2008: 90-100 | |
| 64 | Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven: A Process Model of Legal Argument with Hypotheticals. JURIX 2008: 1-10 | |
| 2007 | ||
| 63 | Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch: Evaluating Legal Argument Instruction with Graphical Representations Using LARGO. AIED 2007: 101-108 | |
| 62 | Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch, Niels Pinkwart: AIED Applications in Ill-Defined Domains. AIED 2007: 713 | |
| 61 | Kevin D. Ashley: Interpretive Reasoning with Hypothetical Cases. FLAIRS Conference 2007: 387-392 | |
| 60 | Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Collin Lynch, Vincent Aleven: Learning by diagramming Supreme Court oral arguments. ICAIL 2007: 271-275 | |
| 59 | Niels Pinkwart, Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven: Student's Usage of Multiple Linked Argument Representations in LARGO. Mensch & Computer 2007: 245-250 | |
| 2006 | ||
| 58 | Mitsuru Ikeda, Kevin D. Ashley, Tak-Wai Chan: Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 8th International Conference, ITS 2006, Jhongli, Taiwan, June 26-30, 2006, Proceedings Springer 2006 | |
| 57 | Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Progress in Textual Case-Based Reasoning: Predicting the Outcome of Legal Cases from Text. AAAI 2006: 1577-1580 | |
| 56 | Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch: Schwachstellenermittlung und Rückmeldungsprinzipen in einem intelligenten Tutorensystem für juristische Argumentation. DeLFI 2006: 75-86 | |
| 55 | Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch: Toward Legal Argument Instruction with Graph Grammars and Collaborative Filtering Techniques. Intelligent Tutoring Systems 2006: 227-236 | |
| 2005 | ||
| 54 | Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley: Toward supporting hypothesis formation and testing in an interpretive domain. AIED 2005: 732-734 | |
| 53 | Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley, Collin Lynch: Helping Law Students to Understand US Supreme Court Oral Arguments: A Planned Experiment. ICAIL 2005: 55-59 | |
| 52 | Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Generating Legal Arguments and Predictions from Case Texts. ICAIL 2005: 65-74 | |
| 51 | Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Reasoning with Textual Cases. ICCBR 2005: 137-151 | |
| 50 | Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley: Towards Modeling Systematic Interpretation of Codified Law. JURIX 2005: 107-108 | |
| 49 | Rosina O. Weber, Kevin D. Ashley, Stefanie Brüninghaus: Textual case-based reasoning. Knowledge Eng. Review 20(3): 255-260 (2005) | |
| 48 | Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley, Karl Branting: Case-based reasoning and law. Knowledge Eng. Review 20(3): 293-298 (2005) | |
| 2003 | ||
| 47 | Kevin D. Ashley, Derek G. Bridge: Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development, 5th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, ICCBR 2003, Trondheim, Norway, June 23-26, 2003, Proceedings Springer 2003 | |
| 46 | Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Experimental Design for Evaluating an AI and Law Program. Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems 2003: 10-13 | |
| 45 | Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Predicting Outcomes of Case-Based Legal Arguments. ICAIL 2003: 233-242 | |
| 44 | Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Combining Case-Based and Model-Based Reasoning for Predicting the Outcome of Legal Cases. ICCBR 2003: 65-79 | |
| 43 | Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley, Ronald Prescott Loui: AI and Law: A fruitful synergy. Artif. Intell. 150(1-2): 1-15 (2003) | |
| 42 | Kevin D. Ashley, Edwina L. Rissland: Law, learning and representation. Artif. Intell. 150(1-2): 17-58 (2003) | |
| 2002 | ||
| 41 | Kevin D. Ashley, Ravi Desai, John M. Levine: Teaching Case-Based Argumentation Concepts Using Dialectic Arguments vs. Didactic Explanations. Intelligent Tutoring Systems 2002: 585-595 | |
| 40 | Kevin D. Ashley: An AI model of case-based legal argument from a jurisprudential viewpoint. Artif. Intell. Law 10(1-3): 163-218 (2002) | |
| 39 | Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley: A note on dimensions and factors. Artif. Intell. Law 10(1-3): 65-77 (2002) | |
| 2001 | ||
| 38 | Kevin D. Ashley, Bruce M. McLaren: An AI investigation of citation's cognitive role. ICAIL 2001: 32-41 | |
| 37 | Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Improving the representation of legal case texts with information extraction methods. ICAIL 2001: 42-51 | |
| 36 | Ilya M. Goldin, Kevin D. Ashley, Rosa L. Pinkus: Introducing PETE: computer support for teaching ethics. ICAIL 2001: 94-98 | |
| 35 | Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley: Helping a CBR Program Know What It Knows. ICCBR 2001: 377-391 | |
| 34 | Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: The Role of Information Extraction for Textual CBR. ICCBR 2001: 74-89 | |
| 2000 | ||
| 33 | Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley: Assessing Relevance with Extensionally Defined Principles and Cases. AAAI/IAAI 2000: 316-322 | |
| 1999 | ||
| 32 | Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Toward adding knowledge to learning algorithms for indexing legal cases. ICAIL 1999: 9-17 | |
| 31 | Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley: Case Representation, Acquisition, and Retrieval in SIROCCO. ICCBR 1999: 248-262 | |
| 30 | Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Bootstrapping Case Base Development with Annotated Case Summaries. ICCBR 1999: 59-73 | |
| 1998 | ||
| 29 | Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley: Exploring the Dialectic Between Abstract Rules and Concrete Facts: Operationalizing Principles and Cases in Engineering Ethics. EWCBR 1998: 37-51 | |
| 1997 | ||
| 28 | Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Finding Factors: Learning to Classify Case Opinions Under Abstract Fact Categories. ICAIL 1997: 123-131 | |
| 27 | Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley: Evaluating a Learning Environment for Case-Based Argumentation Skills. ICAIL 1997: 170-179 | |
| 26 | Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley: Using Machine Learning for Assigning Indices to Textual Cases. ICCBR 1997: 303-314 | |
| 25 | Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven: Reasoning Symbolically About Partially Matched Cases. IJCAI (1) 1997: 335-341 | |
| 1996 | ||
| 24 | Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley: How Different Is Different? Arguing About the Significance of Similarities and Differences. EWCBR 1996: 1-15 | |
| 1995 | ||
| 23 | Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley: Doing Things with Factors. ICAIL 1995: 31-41 | |
| 22 | Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley: Context Sensitive Case Comparisons in Practical Ethics: Reasoning About Reasons. ICAIL 1995: 316-325 | |
| 21 | Kevin D. Ashley, Bruce M. McLaren: Reasoning with Reasons in Case-Based Comparisons. ICCBR 1995: 133-144 | |
| 1994 | ||
| 20 | Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley: An Instructional Environment for Practicing Argumentation Skills. AAAI 1994: 485-492 | |
| 19 | Kevin D. Ashley, Bruce M. McLaren: A CBR Knowledge Representation for Practical Ethics. EWCBR 1994: 181-197 | |
| 1993 | ||
| 18 | Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven: A Logical Representation for Relevance Criteria. EWCBR 1993: 338-352 | |
| 17 | Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley: What Law Students Need to Know to WIN. ICAIL 1993: 152-161 | |
| 1992 | ||
| 16 | Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven: Generating Dialectical Examples Automatically. AAAI 1992: 654-660 | |
| 15 | Vincent Aleven, Kevin D. Ashley: Automated Generation of Examples for a Tutorial in Case-Based Argumentation. Intelligent Tutoring Systems 1992: 475-584 | |
| 14 | Kevin D. Ashley: Case-based reasoning and its implications for legal expert systems. Artif. Intell. Law 1(2-3): 113-208 (1992) | |
| 1991 | ||
| 13 | Kevin D. Ashley, Vincent Aleven: Toward an Intelligent Tutoring System for Teaching Law Students to Argue with Cases. ICAIL 1991: 42-52 | |
| 12 | Kevin D. Ashley: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals in HYPO. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34(6): 753-796 (1991) | |
| 1990 | ||
| 11 | Kevin D. Ashley: Modeling legal argument - reasoning with cases and hypotheticals. MIT Press 1990: I-X, 1-329 | |
| 1989 | ||
| 10 | Kevin D. Ashley: Toward a Computational Theory of Arguing with Precedents. ICAIL 1989: 93-102 | |
| 9 | Kevin D. Ashley: Defining Salience in Case-Based Arguments. IJCAI 1989: 537-542 | |
| 1988 | ||
| 8 | Kevin D. Ashley, Edwina L. Rissland: Waiting on Weighting: A Symbolic Least Commitment Approach. AAAI 1988: 239-244 | |
| 7 | Kevin D. Ashley, Edwina L. Rissland: A Case-Based Approach to Modeling Legal Expertise. IEEE Expert 3(3): 70-77 (1988) | |
| 1987 | ||
| 6 | Kevin D. Ashley, Edwina L. Rissland: Compare and Contrast: A Test of Expertise. AAAI 1987: 273-278 | |
| 5 | Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley: A Case-Based System for Trade Secrets Law. ICAIL 1987: 60-66 | |
| 4 | Kevin D. Ashley, Edwina L. Rissland: But, See, Accord: Generating Blue Book Citations in HYPO. ICAIL 1987: 67-74 | |
| 1986 | ||
| 3 | Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley: Hypotheticals as Heuristic Device. AAAI 1986: 289-297 | |
| 2 | Edwina L. Rissland, Kevin D. Ashley: Hypotheticals as Heuristic Device. HLT 1986 | |
| 1984 | ||
| 1 | Edwina L. Rissland, Eduardo M. Valcarce, Kevin D. Ashley: Explaining and Arguing With Examples. AAAI 1984: 288-294 | |
Colors in the list of coauthors
Last update Sat May 26 04:23:17 2012 CET by the DBLP Team —
Data released under the ODC-BY 1.0 license — See also our legal information page