Research papers

• 
  Kevin D. Ashley: Ontological requirements for analogical, teleological, and hypothetical legal reasoning. 1-10
• 
  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Thomas F. Gordon: Isomorphism and argumentation. 11-20
• 
  Raquel Mochales Palau, Aagje Ieven: Creating an argumentation corpus: do theories apply to real arguments?: a case study on the legal argumentation of the ECHR. 21-30
• 
  Emile de Maat, Radboud Winkels: A next step towards automated modelling of sources of law. 31-39
• 
  Pier-Luigi Spinosa, Gerardo Giardiello, Manola Cherubini, Simone Marchi, Giulia Venturi, Simonetta Montemagni: NLP-based metadata extraction for legal text consolidation. 40-49
• 
  Alessandro Mazzei, Daniele P. Radicioni, Raffaella Brighi: NLP-based extraction of modificatory provisions semantics. 50-57
• 
  Sindhu Joseph, Henry Prakken: Coherence-driven argumentation to norm consensus. 58-67
• 
  Alexander Artikis: Formalising dynamic protocols for open agent systems. 68-77
• 
  Nadjet Bouayad-Agha, Gerard Casamayor, Gabriela Ferraro, Simon Mille, Vanesa Vidal, Leo Wanner: Improving the comprehension of legal documentation: the case of patent claims. 78-87
• 
  Eneldo Loza Mencía: Segmentation of legal documents. 88-97
• 
  Raquel Mochales Palau, Marie-Francine Moens: Argumentation mining: the detection, classification and structure of arguments in text. 98-107
• 
  Giovanni Sartor, Michel Rudnianski, Antonino Rotolo, Régis Riveret, Eunate Mayor: Why lawyers are nice (or nasty): a game-theoretical argumentation exercise. 108-117
• 
  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Sanjay Modgil: Case law in extended argumentation frameworks. 118-127
• 
  Phan Minh Dung, Phan Minh Thang, Nguyen Duy Hung: Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines of performance relief. 128-136
• 
  Thomas F. Gordon, Douglas Walton: Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes. 137-146
• 
  Tossapon Boongoen, Qiang Shen: Intelligent hybrid approach to false identity detection. 147-156
• 
  Dino Pedreschi, Salvatore Ruggieri, Franco Turini: Integrating induction and deduction for finding evidence of discrimination. 157-166
• 
  Jack G. Conrad, Jochen L. Leidner, Frank Schilder, Ravi Kondadadi: Query-based opinion summarization for legal blog entries. 167-176
• 
  John Zeleznikow, Brooke Abrahams: Incorporating issues of fairness into development of a multi-agent negotiation support system. 177-184
• 
  Rinke Hoekstra, Radboud Winkels, Erik Hupkes: Reasoning with spatial plans on the semantic web. 185-193
• 
  Christopher Hogan, Robert S. Bauer, Dan Brassil: Human-aided computer cognition for e-discovery. 194-201
• 
  Marc Lauritsen, Thomas F. Gordon: Toward a general theory of document modeling. 202-211

Research abstracts

• 
  Floris Bex, Katie Atkinson: A proposal for evidential reasoning about motives. 212-213
• 
  Vern R. Walker: Plausibility schemas: templates for legal factfinding. 214-215
• 
  Mary-Anne Williams: Evidence transmutations: gathering admissible evidence using belief revision. 216-217
• 
  Cristian Prisacariu, Gerardo Schneider: Abstract specification of legal contracts. 218-219
• 
  Tomasz Zurek, Emil Kruk: Supporting of legal reasoning for cases which are not strictly regulated by law. 220-221
• 
  Collin Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Niels Pinkwart, Vincent Aleven: Toward assessing law students' argument diagrams. 222-223
• 
  Stijn Colen, Fokie Cnossen, Bart Verheij: How much logical structure is helpful in content-based argumentation software for legal case solving? 224-225
• 
  Jan van Dijk, Sunil Choenni, Frans Leeuw: Analyzing a complaint database by means of a genetic-based data mining algorithm. 226-227
• 
  Alzbeta Krausová, Fabio Massacci, Ayda Saïdane: How to capture and use legal patterns in IT. 228-229
• 
  Ir. R. A. Hilhorst, Tom M. van Engers: e-dossier at the Dutch Council of State: design, implementation and lessons learned. 230-231
• 
  Monica Palmirani, Luca Cervone, Fabio Vitali: Legal metadata interchange framework to match CEN metalex. 232-233
• 
  Michael J. Bommarito II, Daniel Martin Katz, Jon Zelner: Law as a seamless web?: comparison of various network representations of the United States Supreme Court corpus (1791-2005). 234-235
• 
  Pierre Mazzega, Danièle Bourcier, Romain Boulet: The network of French legal codes. 236-237
• 
  Raffaella Brighi, Monica Palmirani: Legal text analysis of the modification provisions: a pattern oriented approach. 238-239
• 
  Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley: Using critical questions to disambiguate and formalize statutory provisions. 240-241

last updated on Sun May 26 02:02:21 2013 by the dblp team
data released under the ODC-BY 1.0 license
see also our legal information page