7. ICAIL 1999: Oslo, Norway

• Karl Branting:
  A generative model of narrative cases. 1-8
  
• Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley:
  Toward adding knowledge to learning algorithms for indexing legal cases. 9-17
  
• Andrew Stranieri, John Zeleznikow:
  The evaluation of legal knowledge based systems. 18-24
  
• Edwina L. Rissland:
  I yield one minute...: an analysis of the final speeches from the House impeachment hearings. 25-35
  
• Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon:
  Some observations on modelling case based reasoning with formal argument models. 36-42
  
• Bart Verheij:
  Automated argument assistance for lawyers. 43-52
  
• Hadassa Jakobovits, Dirk Vermeir:
  Dialectic semantics for argumentation frameworks. 53-62
  
• John F. Horty:
  Precedent, deontic logic, and inheritance. 63-72
  
• Laurence Cholvy:
  Checking regulation consistency by using SOL-resolution. 73-79
  
• Layman E. Allen, Charles S. Saxon:
  Application of enriched deontic legal relations: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 7(a), pleadings. 80-89
  
• Rafaél Hernández Marín, Giovanni Sartor:
  Time and norms: a formalisation in the event-calculus. 90-99
  
• Marius J. A. Duker, Arno R. Lodder:
  Sentencing and information management: consistency and the particularities of a case. 100-107
  
• Emilia Bellucci, John Zeleznikow:
  AI techniques for modelling legal negotiation. 108-116
  
• John Yearwood, Andrew Stranieri:
  The integration of retrieval, reasoning and drafting for refugee law: a third generation legal knowledge based system. 117-125
  
• Anja Oskamp, Maaike Tragter, Arno R. Lodder:
  Mutual benefits for AI & law and knowledge management. 126-127
  
• K. C. Mukherjee:
  Automating forms publishing with the Intelligent Filing Manager. 128-129
  
• Graham Greenleaf, Philip Chung, Daniel Austin, Russell Allen, Andrew Mowbray:
  With a wysh and a prayer: an experiment in cooperative development of legal knowledgebases. 130-131
  
• Katsumi Nitta, Masato Shibasaki, Akira Yamazaki, Yoshiaki Yasumura:
  A legal negotiation support system. 132-133
  
• Mohamed T. Elhadi, Tibor Vamos:
  Bankruptcy case law: a hybrid IR-CBR approach. 134-135
  
• Marco Costa, José Neves, Orlando Sousa, Simas Santos:
  Verification and normalization of sentences. 136-137
  
• Khalid Al-Kofahi, Brian Grom, Peter Jackson:
  Anaphora resolution in the extraction of treatment history language from court opinions by partial parsing. 138-146
  
• Tânia C. D'Agostini Bueno, Christiane Gresse von Wangenheim, Eduardo da Silva Mattos, Hugo Cesar Hoeschl, Ricardo Miranda Barcia:
  JurisConsulto: retrieval in jurisprudencial text bases using juridical terminology. 147-155
  
• Erich Schweighofer, Dieter Merkl:
  A learning technique for legal document analysis. 156-163
  
• Rosina Weber:
  Intelligent jurisprudence research: a new concept. 164-172
  
• James Osborn, Leon Sterling:
  JUSTICE: a judicial search tool using intelligent concept extraction. 173-181
  
• Radboud Winkels, D. J. B. Bosscher, A. W. F. Boer, J. A. Breuker:
  Generating exception structures for legal information serving. 182-189
  
• Paulo Quaresma, Irene Pimenta Rodrigues:
  A collaborative legal information retrieval system using dynamic logic programming. 190-191
  
• Lambèr M. M. Royakkers, Frank Dignum:
  From collective to individual commitments. 192-193
  
• Laurens Mommers, H. Jaap van den Herik:
  Knowledge criteria for the evaluation of legal beliefs. 194-195
  
• Tokuyasu Kakuta, Makoto Haraguchi:
  A demonstration of a legal reasoning system based on teleological analogies. 196-205
  
• Yaakov HaCohen-Kerner, Uri J. Schild, John Zeleznikow:
  Developing computational models of discretion to build legal knowledge based systems. 206-213
  
• Karl Branting, Charles B. Callaway, Bradford W. Mott, James C. Lester:
  Integrating discourse and domain knowledge for document drafting. 214-220
  

Last update Fri May 25 08:16:27 2012 CET by the DBLP Team — Data released under the ODC-BY 1.0 license — See also our legal information page